WHAT DOES CASE LAW PROPERTY SALE ON SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MEAN?

What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?

What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?

Blog Article

However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of your parties, arising out on the over marriage with the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees apply.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They are really directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it really is actually pretty vague about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-working day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of your boy or Woman will not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they more info could do if they might Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by regulation.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page